<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strombotne Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strombotnelaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com</link>
	<description>Real Estate Transactions, Litigation, Mediation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>THE SOLE REMEDY FOR A LENDER’S VIOLATION OF CIVIL CODE §2923.5 (FAILURE TO EXPLORE FORECLOSURE ALTERNATIVES) IS POSTPONEMENT OF THE FORECLOSURE SALE</title>
		<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/300</link>
		<comments>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/300#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strombotnelaw.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only remedy available to a homeowner for the lender’s violation of its statutory obligation to explore options to prevent foreclosure, is postponement of the impending foreclosure sale.  However, if the foreclosure sale has already occurred, the lender’s noncompliance does not affect the validity of the foreclosure sale.  Mabry v. Superior Court (2010) 185 CA4th [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/300/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FORECLOSURE FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT MUST BE IN WRITING TO BE ENFORCEABLE</title>
		<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/foreclosure-forbearance-agreement-must-be-in-writing-to-be-enforceable-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/foreclosure-forbearance-agreement-must-be-in-writing-to-be-enforceable-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strombotnelaw.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 9, 2008 the California Court of Appeal ruled that a lender’s oral promise not to foreclose on a homeowner was not enforceable unless it was put in writing and signed by the lender.  Secrest v. Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 167 Cal. App. 4th 544 (2008) FACTS: The Secrests purchased a home in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/foreclosure-forbearance-agreement-must-be-in-writing-to-be-enforceable-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BROKER HAS FIDUCIARY DUTY TO DISCLOSE TO THEIR CLIENT, MATERIAL INFORMATION KNOWN TO ANY OF THE BROKER’S AGENTS</title>
		<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/broker-has-fiduciary-duty-to-disclose-to-their-client-material-information-known-to-any-of-the-broker%e2%80%99s-agents</link>
		<comments>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/broker-has-fiduciary-duty-to-disclose-to-their-client-material-information-known-to-any-of-the-broker%e2%80%99s-agents#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strombotnelaw.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Court of Appeal for the Second District on November 1, 2007 ruled that a real estate broker has a fiduciary duty to disclose material information to its client, regardless of which salesperson in the broker’s office has the information.  Michel v. Palo Verdes Network Group 67 Cal.Rptr. 3d 797 (2007). FACTS: Kirkpatrick, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/broker-has-fiduciary-duty-to-disclose-to-their-client-material-information-known-to-any-of-the-broker%e2%80%99s-agents/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESCROW AGENT’S DUTY TO COMPLY WITH LENDER’S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS CONTINUES EVEN AFTER THE CLOSE OF ESCROW</title>
		<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/escrow-agent%e2%80%99s-duty-to-comply-with-lender%e2%80%99s-instructions-for-the-disbursement-of-funds-continues-even-after-the-close-of-escrow</link>
		<comments>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/escrow-agent%e2%80%99s-duty-to-comply-with-lender%e2%80%99s-instructions-for-the-disbursement-of-funds-continues-even-after-the-close-of-escrow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strombotnelaw.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An escrow agent’s duty to disclose the distribution of loan monies to the lender, as agreed in the closing instructions, does not end upon close of escrow but continues until all monies have been distributed and the loans are closed.  Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. v. North American Title Company, Inc.  184 CA4th 130 (2010). FACTS: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/escrow-agent%e2%80%99s-duty-to-comply-with-lender%e2%80%99s-instructions-for-the-disbursement-of-funds-continues-even-after-the-close-of-escrow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONTRACT LANGUAGE ADVISING BUYER TO INVESTIGATE CONDITION OF PROPERTY BEFORE RELYING UPON AGENT’S STATEMENTS DOES NOT PROTECT AGENT FROM LIABILITY</title>
		<link>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/contract-language-advising-buyer-to-investigate-condition-of-property-before-relying-upon-agent%e2%80%99s-statements-does-not-protect-agent-from-liability-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/contract-language-advising-buyer-to-investigate-condition-of-property-before-relying-upon-agent%e2%80%99s-statements-does-not-protect-agent-from-liability-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strombotnelaw.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strombotnelaw.com/contract-language-advising-buyer-to-investigate-condition-of-property-before-relying-upon-agent%e2%80%99s-statements-does-not-protect-agent-from-liability-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
